Pittsfield Township took the position that the proposed use violated its zoning ordinance and thus was impermissible because the Township Zoning Act (TZA), M.C.L. The I-1 district ordinance neither expressly nor conditionally permits such a use. With the financial participation of the city of Ann Arbor, the county advertised a proposal to construct a new homeless shelter, which it would own, on the property. Washtenaw County owns property in Pittsfield Charter Township that the township's zoning ordinance has designated as I-1 (limited industrial). We hold that the county does not need to comply with the township's zoning ordinance and, therefore, reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the summary-disposition order entered by the trial court. The question presented is whether defendant Washtenaw County must comply with plaintiff Pittsfield Charter Township's zoning ordinance in the locating of the county's proposed homeless shelter. Thall), Kalamazoo, MI, for the Michigan Townships Association. MI, for the Michigan Association of Countiesīauckham, Sparks, Rolfe, Lohrstorfer & Thall, P.C.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |